Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Glick v. Ballentine Produce Inc., 168 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 168 Visitors: 6
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 10, 1966
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 385 U.S. 5 (1966) GLICK ET AL. v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL. No. 168. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 10, 1966. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI. Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants. Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
385 U.S. 5 (1966)

GLICK ET AL.
v.
BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL.

No. 168.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 10, 1966.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.

Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants.

Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer