Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen, 220 (1966)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 220
Visitors: 22
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 24, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 385 U.S. 20 (1966) ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL. No. 220. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 10, 1966. Decided October 24, 1966. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck. Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P.
Summary: 385 U.S. 20 (1966) ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL. No. 220. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 10, 1966. Decided October 24, 1966. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck. Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. ..
More
385 U.S. 20 (1966)
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL.
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL.
No. 220.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: CourtListener
