Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

I. L. Clayton, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina v. United States, 893 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 893 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 02, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 384 U.S. 156 86 S. Ct. 1379 16 L. Ed. 2d 432 I. L. CLAYTON, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina v. UNITED STATES. No. 893. Supreme Court of the United States May 2, 1966 Thomas Wade Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein, for the United States. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to dismiss is gran
More

384 U.S. 156

86 S. Ct. 1379

16 L. Ed. 2d 432

I. L. CLAYTON, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 893.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 2, 1966

Thomas Wade Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein, for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Insurance Co. v. Lucas, 314 U.S. 575, 62 S. Ct. 107, 86 L. Ed. 466; Public Service Commission of State of Mo. v. Brashear Lines, 306 U.S. 204, 59 S. Ct. 480, 83 L. Ed. 608.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer