Camodeo v. United States, 1073, Misc (1967)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 1073, Misc
Visitors: 17
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 05, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 387 U.S. 575 (1967) CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES. No. 1073, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 5, 1967. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated a
Summary: 387 U.S. 575 (1967) CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES. No. 1073, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 5, 1967. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated an..
More
387 U.S. 575 (1967)
CAMODEO
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 1073, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 5, 1967.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Source: CourtListener
