Filed: Dec. 04, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 389 U.S. 968 88 S. Ct. 460 19 L. Ed. 2d 459 Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA. No. 154. Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1967 F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. 1 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition
Summary: 389 U.S. 968 88 S. Ct. 460 19 L. Ed. 2d 459 Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA. No. 154. Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1967 F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. 1 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition ..
More
389 U.S. 968
88 S. Ct. 460
19 L. Ed. 2d 459
Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1967
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
1
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
2
'1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self-incrimination.
3
'2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.'
4
The case is placed on the summary calendar.
