Belcher v. Wisconsin, 24, Misc (1967)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 24, Misc
Visitors: 25
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: May 22, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 387 U.S. 241 (1967) BELCHER v. WISCONSIN. No. 24, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 22, 1967. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is rem
Summary: 387 U.S. 241 (1967) BELCHER v. WISCONSIN. No. 24, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 22, 1967. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is rema..
More
387 U.S. 241 (1967)
BELCHER
v.
WISCONSIN.
No. 24, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided May 22, 1967.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
Petitioner pro se.
Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Source: CourtListener
