Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lordi v. Epstein, 322 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 322 Visitors: 22
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 16, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 389 U.S. 29 (1967) LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL., TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. No. 322. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 16, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Charles H. Tuttle for appellees. PER CURIAM. Th
More
389 U.S. 29 (1967)

LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY
v.
EPSTEIN ET AL., TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO.

No. 322.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 16, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer