Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte, 726 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 726 Visitors: 6
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 268 (1967) WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL. v. APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL. No. 726. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 13, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants. J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion
More
386 U.S. 268 (1967)

WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL.
v.
APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.

No. 726.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 13, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO.

Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants.

J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer