Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

City of Galveston v. United States, 827 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 827 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 269 87 S. Ct. 1018 18 L. Ed. 2d 38 CITY OF GALVESTON et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 827. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 828. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 Harold E. Spencer and Nuel D. Belnap, for appellants City of Galveston and others. Don McDevitt, Sterling W. Steves, Harvey Huston and Milton E. Nelson, Jr., for appellants Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. and others. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney Genera
More

386 U.S. 269

87 S. Ct. 1018

18 L. Ed. 2d 38

CITY OF GALVESTON et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 827.

The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO. et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 828.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 13, 1967

Harold E. Spencer and Nuel D. Belnap, for appellants City of Galveston and others.

Don McDevitt, Sterling W. Steves, Harvey Huston and Milton E. Nelson, Jr., for appellants Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. and others.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for the United States and others.

Frank A. Leffingwell, for appellees Nueces County Nav. Dist. No. 1 and others.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer