Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

New York v. United States, 968 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 968 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 17, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 349 87 S. Ct. 1161 18 L. Ed. 2d 98 NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 968. Supreme Court of the United States March 20, 1967 Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Sol. Gen., Dunton F. Tynan, Asst. Sol. Gen., Matthew A. Tiffany, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Walter J. Myskowski, for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for the United States and others. R. J. Murphy and D.
More

386 U.S. 349

87 S. Ct. 1161

18 L. Ed. 2d 98

NEW YORK
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 968.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 20, 1967

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Sol. Gen., Dunton F. Tynan, Asst. Sol. Gen., Matthew A. Tiffany, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Walter J. Myskowski, for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for the United States and others.

R. J. Murphy and D. M. Tolmie, for appellee railroads.

William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen., and Edward Friedman, for appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Eugene T. Liipfert, for appellees Port Authority of Allegheny County and others.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer