Schneble v. Florida, 1070, Misc (1968)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 1070, Misc
Visitors: 25
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 10, 1968
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2017
Summary: 392 U.S. 298 (1968) SCHNEBLE ET AL. v. FLORIDA. No. 1070, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1968. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that cou
Summary: 392 U.S. 298 (1968) SCHNEBLE ET AL. v. FLORIDA. No. 1070, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1968. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that cour..
More
392 U.S. 298 (1968)
SCHNEBLE ET AL.
v.
FLORIDA.
No. 1070, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 10, 1968.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
Source: CourtListener
