Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roger D. Branigin v. Dorothy S. Duddleston, 1252 (1968)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 1252 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 14, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 391 U.S. 364 88 S. Ct. 1666 20 L. Ed. 2d 641 Roger D. BRANIGIN et al. v. Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al. No. 1252. Joseph W. SUMMERS v. Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al. No. 1263. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. October Term, 1967. May 20, 1968 John J. Dillon, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, and Charles S. White, for appellants Roger D. Branigin and others. Marshall F. Kizer, for appellant Joseph W. Summers. Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger, for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The motio
More

391 U.S. 364

88 S. Ct. 1666

20 L. Ed. 2d 641

Roger D. BRANIGIN et al.
v.
Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al.

No. 1252.

Joseph W. SUMMERS

v.

Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al.

No. 1263.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

October Term, 1967.

May 20, 1968

John J. Dillon, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, and Charles S. White, for appellants Roger D. Branigin and others.

Marshall F. Kizer, for appellant Joseph W. Summers.

Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

2

Mr. Justice HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, 88 S. Ct. 1016, 19 L. Ed. 2d 1124, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer