Bujese v. United States, 440, Misc (1968)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 440, Misc
Visitors: 13
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 10, 1968
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2017
Summary: 392 U.S. 297 (1968) BUJESE v. UNITED STATES. No. 440, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1968. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for
Summary: 392 U.S. 297 (1968) BUJESE v. UNITED STATES. No. 440, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1968. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for t..
More
392 U.S. 297 (1968)
BUJESE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 440, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 10, 1968.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
Source: CourtListener
