Filed: Mar. 04, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 389 U.S. 582 88 S. Ct. 694 19 L. Ed. 2d 782 Ward M. MILLER v. Robert A. HAINES, Director, etc., et al. No. 840. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. January 15, 1968 Rehearing Denied March 4, 1968. See 390 U.S. 975 , 88 S. Ct. 1027 . Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant. William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles S. Lopeman, for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a sub
Summary: 389 U.S. 582 88 S. Ct. 694 19 L. Ed. 2d 782 Ward M. MILLER v. Robert A. HAINES, Director, etc., et al. No. 840. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. January 15, 1968 Rehearing Denied March 4, 1968. See 390 U.S. 975 , 88 S. Ct. 1027 . Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant. William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles S. Lopeman, for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a subs..
More
389 U.S. 582
88 S. Ct. 694
19 L. Ed. 2d 782
Ward M. MILLER
v.
Robert A. HAINES, Director, etc., et al.
No. 840.
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1967.
January 15, 1968
Rehearing Denied March 4, 1968.
See 390 U.S. 975, 88 S. Ct. 1027.
Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant.
William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles S. Lopeman, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
2
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
