Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TV Pix, Inc. v. Taylor, 214 (1970)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 214 Visitors: 9
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Mar. 09, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 396 U.S. 556 (1970) TV PIX, INC., ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. No. 214. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 2, 1970. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA. George M. McMillan for appellants. Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General of Nevada, for appellees. Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Geller for the United States, and by Paul Rodgers for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
More
396 U.S. 556 (1970)

TV PIX, INC., ET AL.
v.
TAYLOR ET AL.

No. 214.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 2, 1970.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.

George M. McMillan for appellants.

Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General of Nevada, for appellees.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Geller for the United States, and by Paul Rodgers for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. E. Stratford Smith and Bruce Lovett filed a brief for the National Cable Television Association, Inc., as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for leave to file a brief, is amicus curiae, is granted. The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss or affirm is also granted.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer