Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gerstein v. Coe, 73-1157 (1974)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 73-1157 Visitors: 21
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 03, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 417 U.S. 279 (1974) GERSTEIN ET AL. v. COE ET AL. No. 73-1157. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 3, 1974. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. PER CURIAM. A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and if unmarried and under the age of 18, without
More
417 U.S. 279 (1974)

GERSTEIN ET AL.
v.
COE ET AL.

No. 73-1157.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 3, 1974.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.

PER CURIAM.

A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and if unmarried and under the age of 18, without the consent of a parent. Because it was anticipated that the State would respect the declaratory judgment, the court declined to issue an injunction against the enforcement of the statute. The State of Florida appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating the statute. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Title 28 U.S. C. § 1253, under which this appeal is sought to be taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. Gunn v. University Committee, 399 U.S. 383 (1970); Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427 (1970); Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, 397 U.S. 820 (1970); see also Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 123 (1973). The declaratory judgment is appealable to the Court of Appeals, and we are informed that an *280 appeal to that court has already been taken. It is suggested that we treat the statement of jurisdiction as a petition for certiorari before judgment to the Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1254 (1). The petition for certiorari is denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer