Fordjour v. California, 01-8496 (2002)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 01-8496
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 22, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 535 U.S. 1014 FORDJOUR v. CALIFORNIA. No. 01-8496. Supreme Court of the United States. April 22, 2002. 1 Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with
Summary: 535 U.S. 1014 FORDJOUR v. CALIFORNIA. No. 01-8496. Supreme Court of the United States. April 22, 2002. 1 Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with ..
More
535 U.S. 1014
FORDJOUR
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 01-8496.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 22, 2002.
1
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
Source: CourtListener
