In Re Seaton, 02-9445 (2003)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 02-9445
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 07, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 538 U.S. 959 IN RE SEATON. No. 02-9445. Supreme Court of United States. April 7, 2003. 1 APPLICATION TO FILE PETITION. 2 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is su
Summary: 538 U.S. 959 IN RE SEATON. No. 02-9445. Supreme Court of United States. April 7, 2003. 1 APPLICATION TO FILE PETITION. 2 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is sub..
More
538 U.S. 959
IN RE SEATON.
No. 02-9445.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 7, 2003.
1
APPLICATION TO FILE PETITION.
2
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
Source: CourtListener
