Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alabama v. North Carolina, 132, Orig (2003)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 132, Orig Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 17, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 540 U.S. 1014 ALABAMA ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 132, Orig. Supreme Court of United States. November 17, 2003. 1 It is ordered that Bradford R. Clark, Esq., of Washington, D. C., be appointed as Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for.
More

540 U.S. 1014

ALABAMA ET AL.
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 132, Orig.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 17, 2003.

1

It is ordered that Bradford R. Clark, Esq., of Washington, D. C., be appointed as Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

2

The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his reports, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct. [For earlier order herein, see 539 U.S. 925.]

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer