DALE v. TYLER, 14-4102. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. South Dakota
Number: infdco20150710c32
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL , District Judge . Plaintiff James Irving Dale, an inmate at the Mike Durfee State Prison, has filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 20, be granted as to (A) all of Dale's Due Process Claims; (B) all of the claims against Defendants Dooley, Deglman, and Schieffer; and (C) all official capacity claims for money damages against all na
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL , District Judge . Plaintiff James Irving Dale, an inmate at the Mike Durfee State Prison, has filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 20, be granted as to (A) all of Dale's Due Process Claims; (B) all of the claims against Defendants Dooley, Deglman, and Schieffer; and (C) all official capacity claims for money damages against all nam..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Irving Dale, an inmate at the Mike Durfee State Prison, has filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 20, be granted as to (A) all of Dale's Due Process Claims; (B) all of the claims against Defendants Dooley, Deglman, and Schieffer; and (C) all official capacity claims for money damages against all named defendants. The Report and Recommendation further recommended the balance of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied without prejudice to their ability to re-assert these arguments in a properly supported motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. After conducting an independent review of the record, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is well reasoned and supported, and that the Objections to the Report and Recommendation are without merit, and accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Doc. 34, is ADOPTED and Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation, Doc. 35, are DENIED.
2. That Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 20, is granted as to:
A. All of Dale's Due Process Claims;
B. All of the Claims against Defendants Dooley, Deglman, and Schieffer; and
C. All official capacity claims for money damages against all named Defendants.
3. That the balance of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to their ability to re-assert these arguments in a properly supported motionir summary judgment.
Source: Leagle
