Serrano-Vargas v. U.S., 4:18-CV-04084-KES. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Dakota
Number: infdco20181228a59
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE KAREN E. SCHREIER , District Judge . Movant, Evaristo Serrano-Vargas, filed this lawsuit as a pro se petition for a writ of coram nobis. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) for the purpose of conducting any necessary hearings, including evidentiary hearings. The United States moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. Docket 10. On December 7, 2018, the magistra
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE KAREN E. SCHREIER , District Judge . Movant, Evaristo Serrano-Vargas, filed this lawsuit as a pro se petition for a writ of coram nobis. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) for the purpose of conducting any necessary hearings, including evidentiary hearings. The United States moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. Docket 10. On December 7, 2018, the magistrat..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Movant, Evaristo Serrano-Vargas, filed this lawsuit as a pro se petition for a writ of coram nobis. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for the purpose of conducting any necessary hearings, including evidentiary hearings. The United States moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. Docket 10.
On December 7, 2018, the magistrate judge submitted her report and recommended that the motion to dismiss of the United States (Docket 10) be granted and that Serrano-Vargas's petition for a writ of coram nobis (Docket 1) be dismissed with prejudice
Serrano-Vargas was notified in the report and recommendation that he had 14 days to file objections to the report. Even though no objections were filed that would require de novo review under Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990), the court reviewed the matter de novo and finds that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted in full. Therefore, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Docket 13) is adopted in full.
2. The government's motion to dismiss (Docket 10) is granted.
3. Serrano-Vargas's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
