1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 88">*88 Issue 3. Upon the facts, held, that petitioner, Charles S. Weil, during 1947, contributed more than one-half of the support of each of the two children of himself and Beulah Weil and is, therefore, entitled to two dependency credits under the provisions of section 25(b)(1)(D) and (b)(3) as they applied to
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
HARRON, Judge: An original report in these proceedings is found in
Supplemental Findings of Fact
Throughout the year 1947, the two minor children of Charles S. Weil and Beulah Weil, namely, Charles Ronald Weil and Donald S. Weil, were unmarried and resided with Beulah Weil, Charles and Beulah having been divorced in 1940. The total cost of the support of the two children during 1947 amounted to $10,895.45, of which amount Charles S. Weil contributed $8,546, and Beulah Weil contributed $2,349.45.
Over one-half of the support of each child, Charles Ronald and Donald, was paid by their father, Charles S. Weil.
In their respective individual income tax returns for 1947, neither Charles S. Weil nor Beulah Weil claimed a credit or credits for their children, Charles Ronald and Donald, as dependents.
Supplemental Opinion
It was been held in these proceedings (
Issue 3. Charles S. Weil, by amendment to his petition in Docket No. 43858, now claims, for 1947, two dependency credits of $500, each, for each of his children. The facts establish that he contributed during 1947 more than one-half of the support of the two children in question. Therefore, it is held that Charles S. Weil is entitled to the two dependency credits for 1947 under the provisions of sections 25(b)(1)(D) and 25(b)(3) of the 1939 Code as it applied to the year 1947.
In determining the deficiency in the income tax liability of Beulah Weil for 1947 (Docket No. 43366), the Commissioner allowed her two dependency credits for her two minor children. This was error. In the Rule 50 recomputation in Docket No. 43366, the error will be corrected in conformance1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 88">*91 with the facts now found and holding here made.
By amendment to his answer, to conform to the proof, in Docket No. 43366, Beulah Weil, the Commissioner has made claim for increase in the deficiency pursuant to the provisions of section 272(e) of the 1939 Code. The claim for the increase in the deficiency was made at a rehearing; the conditions of section 272(e) have been met.
Under the new issue here decided, Issue 3, it is necessary for the parties in Docket Nos. 43366 and 43858 to file revised recomputations under Rule 50.
Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.