IN RE HALLMARK COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 08-16-00175-CV. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20160819467
Filed: Aug. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . The Court has this day considered the Relator's emergency motion for temporary relief filed pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 52.10 and concludes the motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, the trial court's order entered on July 21, 2016 in cause number 2014-DCV2416, styled Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company v. Catalina Hernandez, Individually and d/b/a Arca Trucking Services, LLC and Arca Trucking Services, LLC, granting the Real Parties in Interest's motion to compel, is
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . The Court has this day considered the Relator's emergency motion for temporary relief filed pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 52.10 and concludes the motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, the trial court's order entered on July 21, 2016 in cause number 2014-DCV2416, styled Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company v. Catalina Hernandez, Individually and d/b/a Arca Trucking Services, LLC and Arca Trucking Services, LLC, granting the Real Parties in Interest's motion to compel, is ..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Court has this day considered the Relator's emergency motion for temporary relief filed pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 52.10 and concludes the motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, the trial court's order entered on July 21, 2016 in cause number 2014-DCV2416, styled Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company v. Catalina Hernandez, Individually and d/b/a Arca Trucking Services, LLC and Arca Trucking Services, LLC, granting the Real Parties in Interest's motion to compel, is stayed. More specifically, the discovery order is stayed insofar as it compels the production of documents relating to:
(1) the intervention Relator filed;
(2) any contacts Relator had with Steven R. Hudgins, the attorney for Relator who filed the intervention;
(3) the claim file for the intervention; and
(4) other lawsuits in the last ten years that have been filed against
Relator regarding denial of coverage or the denial of a defense. Further, the trial court's order compelling deposition testimony from Relator's corporate representative regarding these documents and topics is also stayed. This stay will remain in effect pending resolution of this original proceeding or further order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
