IN RE MINIX, 14-17-00301-CV. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20170425647
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM : On April 20, 2017, relator Gladys N. Minix filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable David Farr, presiding judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to enter judgment on a mediated settlement agreement. Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM : On April 20, 2017, relator Gladys N. Minix filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable David Farr, presiding judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to enter judgment on a mediated settlement agreement. Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM:
On April 20, 2017, relator Gladys N. Minix filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable David Farr, presiding judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to enter judgment on a mediated settlement agreement.
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (providing that relator must file "a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of"); 52.7(a)(2) (providing that relator must file "a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained" of).
Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay. We also deny as moot real party in interest's motion for extension of time to file response.
Source: Leagle
