IN RE SHILLING, 05-17-00833-CV. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20170829533
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice CRAIG STODDART . Before the Court is relator's July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest's August 21, 2017 response. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124 , 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has no
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice CRAIG STODDART . Before the Court is relator's July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest's August 21, 2017 response. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124 , 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion by Justice CRAIG STODDART.
Before the Court is relator's July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest's August 21, 2017 response. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.
Source: Leagle
