Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . On June 29, 2018, relator filed a Motion for En Banc Reconsideration. On September 14, 2018, the real parties in interest filed a response, and on September 21, 2018, realtor filed a reply. After considering relator's motion, the real parties' in interest response, and relator's subsequent reply, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. FootNotes 2. Chief
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . On June 29, 2018, relator filed a Motion for En Banc Reconsideration. On September 14, 2018, the real parties in interest filed a response, and on September 21, 2018, realtor filed a reply. After considering relator's motion, the real parties' in interest response, and relator's subsequent reply, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. FootNotes 2. Chief ..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On June 29, 2018, relator filed a Motion for En Banc Reconsideration. On September 14, 2018, the real parties in interest filed a response, and on September 21, 2018, realtor filed a reply. After considering relator's motion, the real parties' in interest response, and relator's subsequent reply, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
