EX PARTE LOWREY, 299-01. (2016)
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20160921593
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2016
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH ORDER PER CURIAM . Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child causing serious mental deficiency, impairment, or injury and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lowre
Summary: DO NOT PUBLISH ORDER PER CURIAM . Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child causing serious mental deficiency, impairment, or injury and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lowrey..
More
DO NOT PUBLISH
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child causing serious mental deficiency, impairment, or injury and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lowrey v. State, No. 03-10-00699-CR (Tex. App.-Austin Aug. 3, 2012) (not designated for publication).
This Court has received and independently reviewed Applicant's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Applicant's First Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Applicant's Supplemental Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The trial court's findings are supported by the record, and this Court concludes, after an independent review of the entire habeas record, that Applicant fails to demonstrate entitlement to habeas relief. Applicant's habeas claims are therefore denied.
Source: Leagle
