Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ROMELIEN, 1:10M 8009 (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20120307d42 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER, Magistrate Judge. The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on March 2, 2012, in accordance with Rules 5 and 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an initial appearance of the defendant on an Information and Warrant out of the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. Those present for the hearing included: (1) AUSA Steve Neff for the USA. (2) The defendant, Oscar Romelien, Jr. (3) Attorney Anthony Martinez of Fed
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER, Magistrate Judge.

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on March 2, 2012, in accordance with Rules 5 and 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an initial appearance of the defendant on an Information and Warrant out of the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Steve Neff for the USA. (2) The defendant, Oscar Romelien, Jr. (3) Attorney Anthony Martinez of Federal Defender Services. (4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.

After being sworn in due form of law, the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was ascertained defendant had been provided with a copy of the Indictment and Warrant and had the opportunity of reviewing the documents with his attorney. It was determined defendant was able to understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

AUSA Neff moved defendant be detained without bail pending a hearing in the Northern District of Ohio.

Findings

(1) Explanation of Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were made to the defendant. The defendant waived his Rule 5 identity hearing. The defendant asked to have a detention hearing in the charging district.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his transfer to the Northern District of Ohio. (2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to the Northern District of Ohio for a hearing before a U.S. Magistrate Judge on a date to be determined once defendant is in said district.

ENTER.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer