GRISSOM v. ASTRUE, 3:11-CV-145. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20120813586
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, District Judge. This Social Security appeal is before the court on the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton [Doc. 24]. There have been no timely objections to the report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After a careful review of this matter, the court
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, District Judge. This Social Security appeal is before the court on the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton [Doc. 24]. There have been no timely objections to the report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After a careful review of this matter, the court i..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, District Judge.
This Social Security appeal is before the court on the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton [Doc. 24]. There have been no timely objections to the report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
After a careful review of this matter, the court is in complete agreement with the magistrate judge's recommendation that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be granted. Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 13] is DENIED; the defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 21] is GRANTED, the defendant Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
