U.S. v. PARDUE, 1:09-cr-1. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130912c23
Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM B. BARTER, Magistrate Judge. MICHAEL T. PARDUE ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on September 11, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Amended Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Amended Petition"). Those present for the hearing included: (1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government. (2) The Supervised Releasee. (3) Attorney Mike Caputo
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM B. BARTER, Magistrate Judge. MICHAEL T. PARDUE ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on September 11, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Amended Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Amended Petition"). Those present for the hearing included: (1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government. (2) The Supervised Releasee. (3) Attorney Mike Caputo ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM B. BARTER, Magistrate Judge.
MICHAEL T. PARDUE ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on September 11, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Amended Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Amended Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:
(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government.
(2) The Supervised Releasee.
(3) Attorney Mike Caputo (retained) for defendant.
After being sworn in due form of law, the Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It was determined the Supervised Releasee had been provided with a copy of the Amended Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined he was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided
The Supervised Releasee waived his right to a preliminary hearing and detention hearing.
The Government moved the Supervised Releasee be detained pending a hearing to determine whether his term of supervision should be revoked.
Findings
(1) Based upon the Amended Petition and Supervised Releasee=s waiver of preliminary hearing and detention hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe the Supervised Releasee has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the petition.
Conclusions
It is ORDERED:
(1) The Supervised Releasee shall appear in a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier.
(2) The motion of the Government that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.
(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport the Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, October 10, 2013, at 9:00 am. ENTER.
Source: Leagle
