CIT SMALL BUSINESS LENDING CORPORATION v. ADVANCED DENTAL CONCEPTS, P.C., 3:12-CV-474. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140421952
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CIT Small Business Lending's motion for summary judgment against Fredrico A. Dixon, III. (DE 16). Dixon has not responded to CIT's motion for summary judgment. The Court has already entered summary judgment in favor of CIT against Advanced Dental Concepts, P.C. (DE 14). Pursuant to the Eastern District of Tennessee Local Rule 7.2, "Failure to respond to a motion may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to th
Summary: ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CIT Small Business Lending's motion for summary judgment against Fredrico A. Dixon, III. (DE 16). Dixon has not responded to CIT's motion for summary judgment. The Court has already entered summary judgment in favor of CIT against Advanced Dental Concepts, P.C. (DE 14). Pursuant to the Eastern District of Tennessee Local Rule 7.2, "Failure to respond to a motion may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the..
More
ORDER
KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CIT Small Business Lending's motion for summary judgment against Fredrico A. Dixon, III. (DE 16). Dixon has not responded to CIT's motion for summary judgment. The Court has already entered summary judgment in favor of CIT against Advanced Dental Concepts, P.C. (DE 14). Pursuant to the Eastern District of Tennessee Local Rule 7.2, "Failure to respond to a motion may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the relief sought."
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (DE 16) is GRANTED; and
2. On or before Friday, April 25, 2014, the Defendants SHALL SHOW CAUSE as to why this Court should not enter a judgment against both defendants jointly and severally in the amount of $561,054.42 plus a per diem charge of $78.18 from September 16, 2013 until the date of the judgment, at the legal rate of interest in effect as of the date of this judgment, compounded daily and annually, until paid in full.
Source: Leagle
