Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JOHNSON, 1:13-CR-89. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20141015j85 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge. On September 23, 2014, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, conspiracy to distribute 28 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base ("crack"), a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. 846, 841(
More

ORDER

HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge.

On September 23, 2014, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, conspiracy to distribute 28 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base ("crack"), a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing; and (d) Defendant shall remain in custody pending sentencing in this matter (Doc. 621). Neither party filed an objection within the given fourteen days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and ORDERS as follows:

(1) Defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, is ACCEPTED;

(2) Defendant is hereby ADJUDGED guilty of the charges set forth in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment;

(3) A decision on whether to accept the plea agreement is DEFERRED until sentencing; and

(4) Defendant SHALL REMAIN IN CUSTODY pending sentencing on Monday, January 5, 2015, at 2:00 pm.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer