U.S. v. DAVIS, 1:14-CR-7. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20150129c41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge. On January 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count One of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea ag
Summary: ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge. On January 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count One of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agr..
More
ORDER
HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge.
On January 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count One of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing; and (d) Defendant shall remain in custody pending sentencing in this matter (Doc. 42). Neither party filed an objection within the given fourteen days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and ORDERS as follows:
(1) Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, is ACCEPTED;
(2) Defendant is hereby ADJUDGED guilty of the charges set forth in Count One of the Superseding Indictment;
(3) A decision on whether to accept the plea agreement is DEFERRED until sentencing; and
(4) Defendant SHALL REMAIN IN CUSTODY pending sentencing on Monday, April 13, 2015, at 2:00 pm.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
