Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RIDDLE v. COLVIN, 2:14-CV-130. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20150313d29 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENNIS H. INMAN , Magistrate Judge . This matter has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge under the standing orders of the Court for a report and recommendation regarding the Motion [Doc. 20] for an award of attorneys fees to the plaintiff under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A). The defendant does not oppose the Motion. The plaintiff's case was recently remanded by the District Judge to the defendant for further ad
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge under the standing orders of the Court for a report and recommendation regarding the Motion [Doc. 20] for an award of attorneys fees to the plaintiff under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The defendant does not oppose the Motion.

The plaintiff's case was recently remanded by the District Judge to the defendant for further administrative review. While this fact makes plaintiff entitled to fees under the EAJA, attorney fees under the Social Security Act itself can only be awarded if the plaintiff is ultimately awarded benefits. Should the plaintiff be awarded past due benefits, counsel will be required to refund whichever fee is smaller; either the fee under the EAJA, or the fee under the Social Security Act.

In order to be entitled to an award of attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, all of the conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), (B) must be met. These are that:

(1) the party seeking the fees is the "prevailing party" in a civil action brought by or against the U.S., (2) an application for such fees, including an itemized justification for the amount requested, is timely filed within 30 days of final judgment in the action, (3) the position of the government is not substantially justified and (4) no special circumstances make an award unjust.

The Magistrate Judge finds that all of these factors are met in this case.

An affidavit of the hours expended by plaintiff's counsel and the expenses incurred has been submitted. The undersigned finds both to be reasonable. No request was made for an award of costs.

It is recommended that the plaintiff's Motion be GRANTED, and that plaintiff be awarded EAJA fees in the amount of $$1,637.50, and expenses in the amount of $20.10.1

FootNotes


1. Any objections to this report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14) days of its service or further appeal will be waived. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947-950 (6th Cir. 1981); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer