MIAUN v. COLVIN, 3:14-CV-222-TAV-HBG. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20150513c26
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on April 21, 2015 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommended that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] be granted, that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] be denied, and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. Ther
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on April 21, 2015 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommended that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] be granted, that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] be denied, and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. There..
More
ORDER
THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on April 21, 2015 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommended that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] be granted, that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] be denied, and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] is GRANTED, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] is DENIED, and the case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R&R.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
