U.S. v. GRISHAM, 1:15-cr-52-HSM-SKL. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20150923e70
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SUSAN K. LEE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on September 2, 2015. At the hearing, defendant moved to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One of the six-count Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams ore more of a
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SUSAN K. LEE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on September 2, 2015. At the hearing, defendant moved to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One of the six-count Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams ore more of a m..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SUSAN K. LEE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on September 2, 2015. At the hearing, defendant moved to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One of the six-count Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams ore more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B) in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find the defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; the plea is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.
Therefore, I RECOMMEND defendant's motion to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count One of the Indictment be granted, his plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One of the Indictment, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams ore more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B) be accepted, the Court adjudicate defendant guilty of the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One of the Indictment, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams ore more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B), and a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing. I further RECOMMEND defendant remain in custody until sentencing in this matter. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.
Source: Leagle