Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HICKEY, 1-10-CR-34-CLC-WBC-5. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20151006g34 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSAN K. LEE , Magistrate Judge . STEVEN DANTE HICKEY ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on September 29, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included: (1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government; (2) Supervised Releasee; and (3) An Attorney with Federal Defen
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STEVEN DANTE HICKEY ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on September 29, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:

(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government; (2) Supervised Releasee; and (3) An Attorney with Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee ("FDS") for the Supervised Releasee.

After being sworn in due form of law, Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It was determined that Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. FDS was appointed to represent Supervised Releasee. It was also determined that Supervised Releasee had been provided with and reviewed with counsel a copy of the Petition.

The Government moved that Supervised Releasee be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier. Supervised Releasee waived his right to a preliminary hearing, but requested a detention hearing, which was held. Supervised Releasee proceeded by making a proffer concerning employment. U.S. Probation Officer Cornell Mitchell testified regarding the factual allegations set forth in the Petition and related matters. Both parties presented their respective arguments, which were fully considered by the Court.

Findings

(1) Based upon the petition and supervised releasee's waiver of preliminary hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe Supervised Releasee has committed a violation or violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the Petition. (2) Supervised Releasee has not carried his burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that, if released, he would not pose a danger to another person or to the community or pose a risk of flight under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6).

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) Supervised Releasee shall appear for a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Collier.

(2) The Government's motion that supervised releasee be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.

(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. [EASTERN].

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer