U.S. v. HAMBRIGHT, 2:12-cr-14-RLJ-SKL. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160104686
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSAN K. LEE , Magistrate Judge . RODNELL HAMBRIGHT ("Defendant") appeared for a hearing on December 30, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Defendant was placed under oath and informed of his constitutional rights. It was determined that Defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. Federal Defe
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSAN K. LEE , Magistrate Judge . RODNELL HAMBRIGHT ("Defendant") appeared for a hearing on December 30, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Defendant was placed under oath and informed of his constitutional rights. It was determined that Defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. Federal Defen..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SUSAN K. LEE, Magistrate Judge.
RODNELL HAMBRIGHT ("Defendant") appeared for a hearing on December 30, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition").
Defendant was placed under oath and informed of his constitutional rights. It was determined that Defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee was appointed to represent Defendant. It was also determined that Defendant had been provided with and reviewed with counsel a copy of the Petition.
The Government moved that Defendant be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Jordan. Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing and a detention hearing.
Based upon the Petition and waiver of preliminary hearing, the Court finds there is probable cause to believe Defendant has committed violations of his condition of supervised release as alleged in the Petition.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant shall appear for a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Jordan which will be held in Greeneville.
(2) The Government's motion that Defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Jordan is GRANTED.
(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport Defendant to a revocation hearing set before District Judge Jordan at 10:15 a.m. on February 9, 2016 in the Greeneville Division.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
