NORWOOD v. U.S., 3:04-CR-141-TAV-HBG-1 (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20161128587
Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . For the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner's 2255 motion [Doc. 68] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such notice of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because he has failed to
Summary: JUDGMENT ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . For the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner's 2255 motion [Doc. 68] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such notice of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because he has failed to ..
More
JUDGMENT ORDER
THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief District Judge.
For the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner's § 2255 motion [Doc. 68] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such notice of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because he has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24 that any such appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
