Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Elliott, 1:17-cr-12. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20180103a92 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CHRISTOPHER H. STEGER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted a plea hearing in this case on December 13, 2017. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the one count Indictment. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understandin
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted a plea hearing in this case on December 13, 2017. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the one count Indictment. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by Defendant; it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises; Defendant understands the nature of the charges and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the Plea Agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the District Court Judge.

I therefore recommend that the Court: (1) grant Defendant's motion to withdraw his not guilty plea as to Count One of the one count Indictment; (2) accept Defendant's guilty plea as to Count One of the one count indictment; (3) adjudicate Defendant guilty of escape in violation of Title 18 United States Code § 751; and (4) order that Defendant remain in custody until sentencing in this matter.

The Defendant's sentencing hearing is scheduled on April 6, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.

You have the right to de novo review by the district judge of the foregoing findings. Any application for review must be in writing; must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to; and must be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer