Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Long v. Tennessee, 3:17-cv-113. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20181220e84 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TRAVIS R. McDONOUGH , District Judge . The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has vacated this Court's judgment dismissing this action under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and remanded, directing this Court to dismiss the State of Tennessee as a defendant and to allow Plaintiff to amend his complaint to substitute a state official. (Doc. 47.) Accordingly, the State of Tennessee will be DISMISSED from this action. Plaintiff will be GRANTE
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has vacated this Court's judgment dismissing this action under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and remanded, directing this Court to dismiss the State of Tennessee as a defendant and to allow Plaintiff to amend his complaint to substitute a state official. (Doc. 47.) Accordingly, the State of Tennessee will be DISMISSED from this action. Plaintiff will be GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND his complaint to substitute an appropriate state official.

Plaintiff is suing the State of Tennessee in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and in state court. Both cases challenge the Tennessee Sexual Offender and Violent Sexual Offender Registration, Verification, and Tracking Act of 2004, Tennessee Code Ann. § 40-39-201 et seq. This Court abstained under Younger, due to the pending state-court proceeding, but the Sixth Circuit held that sovereign immunity precludes this suit because "[t]he Eleventh Amendment generally `deprives federal courts of subject-matter jurisdiction when a citizen sues his own State.'" (Doc. 47, at 2 (quoting Russell v. Lundergan-Grimes, 784 F.3d 1037, 1046 (6th Cir. 2015)).) The Sixth Circuit found that, although the State of Tennessee argued for the first time on appeal that the Eleventh Amendment bars this suit, the State did not waive the argument because it is a "true jurisdictional bar." (Id. at 3 (quoting Russell, 784 F.3d at 1046).) The Sixth Circuit further found that none of the three exceptions was applicable here. (Id.) The Sixth Circuit therefore concluded that sovereign immunity bars this suit against the State of Tennessee. (Id. at 4.) However, to avoid prejudicing Plaintiff, the Sixth Circuit directed this Court to allow Plaintiff to substitute a state official. (Id. (citing Berndt v. Tennessee, 796 F.2d 879, 884 (6th Cir. 1986)).)

In accordance with the Sixth Circuit's mandate, the State of Tennessee is hereby DISMISSED from this action. Petitioner is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND his complaint to substitute an appropriate state official. Petitioner SHALL file an amended complaint within thirty days or his claims will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer