Doe v. Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc., 4:19-CV-26-TAV-SKL. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20190528c66
Visitors: 45
Filed: May 24, 2019
Latest Update: May 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , District Judge . This civil action is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee on May 9, 2019 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Defenses in Defendant's Answer [Doc. 14]. There have been no timely objections filed to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having b
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , District Judge . This civil action is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee on May 9, 2019 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Defenses in Defendant's Answer [Doc. 14]. There have been no timely objections filed to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having be..
More
ORDER
THOMAS A. VARLAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee on May 9, 2019 [Doc. 18]. In the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Defenses in Defendant's Answer [Doc. 14]. There have been no timely objections filed to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
After careful review of the matter, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the R&R [Doc. 18] in full pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's motion to strike [Doc. 14] is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
