Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Watson, 1:18-cr-00005. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20191231d01 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CHRISTOPHER H. STEGER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted a plea hearing in this case on December 12, 2019. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count Two of the four count Indictment. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understandi
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted a plea hearing in this case on December 12, 2019. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count Two of the four count Indictment. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by Defendant; it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises; Defendant understands the nature of the charges and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the Plea Agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the District Court Judge.

I therefore recommend that the Court: (1) grant Defendant's motion to withdraw his not guilty plea to Count Two of the four count Indictment; (2) accept Defendant's guilty plea to Count Two of the four count Indictment; (3) adjudicate Defendant guilty of knowingly making a false written statement to a dealer, in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, in order to deceive the dealer as to the lawfulness of the sale of the firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(2); and (4) order that Defendant remain out of custody subject to the Order Setting Conditions of Release [Doc. 42] pending sentencing or further order of this Court.

The Defendant's sentencing hearing is scheduled before the District Judge on April 10, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review by the district judge of the foregoing findings. Any application for review must be in writing; must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to; and must be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer