ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
On January 6, 2012, the Clerk issued an Entry of Default against the defendant, Herbert Layas.
The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No.69) addressing the plaintiff's Request for Specific Relief, to which the plaintiff has filed an Objection (Docket Entry No.74).
The Court is now obliged to conduct a de novo review of these pleadings. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge urges the Court to set aside the Entry of Default against the defendant, Herbert Layas, and deny the plaintiff's Request for Specific Relief. This recommendation is based upon the Magistrate Judge's finding that Herbert Layas has not yet been properly served with process. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions, but for a different reason.
Here, it is not necessary to determine whether the defendant has, as yet, been properly served with process. This action is being brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Docket Entry No.1. To state a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the defendant, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
The defendant, Herbert Layas, is an inmate at the South Central Correctional Center. The plaintiff alleges that, on April 28, 2011, Layas stabbed him six times with a metal shank.
Accordingly, the claims against the defendant, Herbert Layas, are DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(the Court may dismiss a frivolous claim made by a prisoner acting in forma pauperis sua sponte at any time). The Entry of Default is set aside for good cause, Rule 55(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the plaintiff's Request for Specific Relief is DENIED.
For the reasons stated above, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED as MODIFIED. The plaintiff's Objection is OVERRULED.
It is so ORDERED.