JIMENEZ v. VANDERBILT LANDSCAPING, LLC, 3-11-0276. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20120409730
Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 62), Objections filed by the Vanderbilt Defendants/Counter-Claimants 1 (Docket No. 63), and Plaintiffs' Response to those Objections (Docket No. 67). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Vanderbil
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 62), Objections filed by the Vanderbilt Defendants/Counter-Claimants 1 (Docket No. 63), and Plaintiffs' Response to those Objections (Docket No. 67). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Vanderbilt..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 62), Objections filed by the Vanderbilt Defendants/Counter-Claimants1 (Docket No. 63), and Plaintiffs' Response to those Objections (Docket No. 67).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Vanderbilt Defendants are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, the Vanderbilt Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim (Docket No. 53) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendants Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC, Larry Vanderbilt, Sr. and Joffery Vanderbilt.
Source: Leagle
