TIMMS v. TUCKER, 3:11-1109. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20120412d86
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 10). The plaintiff shall have until May 4, 2012, to file a response to the defendant's motion to dismiss. The plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the motion may result in the dismissal of his action. Any party desiring to appeal this Order may do so by filing a motion for review no later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is served upon t
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 10). The plaintiff shall have until May 4, 2012, to file a response to the defendant's motion to dismiss. The plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the motion may result in the dismissal of his action. Any party desiring to appeal this Order may do so by filing a motion for review no later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is served upon th..
More
ORDER
JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 10). The plaintiff shall have until May 4, 2012, to file a response to the defendant's motion to dismiss. The plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the motion may result in the dismissal of his action.
Any party desiring to appeal this Order may do so by filing a motion for review no later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is served upon the party. The motion for review must be accompanied by a brief or other pertinent documents to apprise the District Judge of the basis for appeal. See Rule 72.02(b) of the Local Rules of Court.
So ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
