DIRECT LINE CORPORATION v. CARRINGTON, 3:10-cv-0423. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130705d60
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER LETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered on June 6, 2013. The defendant has filed his timely Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 254). The defendant, however, did not submit the $455 appellate filing fee along with his notice of appeal, or an application to appeal in forma pauperis . The defendant is hereby given notice that, within 30 DAYS after service of this notice, he MUST either submit to this court the $455 appellate filing fee or a properly
Summary: ORDER LETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered on June 6, 2013. The defendant has filed his timely Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 254). The defendant, however, did not submit the $455 appellate filing fee along with his notice of appeal, or an application to appeal in forma pauperis . The defendant is hereby given notice that, within 30 DAYS after service of this notice, he MUST either submit to this court the $455 appellate filing fee or a properly s..
More
ORDER
LETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
Judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered on June 6, 2013. The defendant has filed his timely Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 254).
The defendant, however, did not submit the $455 appellate filing fee along with his notice of appeal, or an application to appeal in forma pauperis. The defendant is hereby given notice that, within 30 DAYS after service of this notice, he MUST either submit to this court the $455 appellate filing fee or a properly supported motion to pursue his appeal in forma pauperis that complies with Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The defendant is notified that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his appeal.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
