Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CROWE v. BAPTIST HEALTH CARE GROUP, 3-13-0456. (2013)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20130705d64 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2013
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. By order entered July 2, 2013 (Docket Entry No. 12), this case was referred to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accord with Local Rule 16.01. As a result, the initial case management conference is RESCHEDULED to Friday, July 19, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN. If the date and time for the rescheduled case management conference presents scheduling conflicts for counsel, they sh
More

ORDER

JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge.

By order entered July 2, 2013 (Docket Entry No. 12), this case was referred to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accord with Local Rule 16.01.

As a result, the initial case management conference is RESCHEDULED to Friday, July 19, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN.

If the date and time for the rescheduled case management conference presents scheduling conflicts for counsel, they shall confer and call Ms. Jeanne Cox, Courtroom Deputy, to reschedule.

By the July 2, 2013, order, the stay of discovery, pursuant to Rule 26(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was lifted.

Prior to the initial case management conference, counsel for the parties shall meet and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall, to the extent possible, exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1).

Prior to the initial case management conference, counsel for the parties shall also confer and shall prepare a proposed, joint initial case management order, including the parties' respective theories of the case, issues resolved and in dispute, proposed scheduling for the progression of the case, and any other relevant matters provided in Local Rule 16.01(d)(1)(c) and 16.01(d)(2). If the parties anticipate discovery of electronically stored information, they shall include in the proposed initial case management order the methodology for such discovery. See Administrative Order No. 174, entered July 9, 2007. If the parties anticipate little, if any, electronic discovery and they believe it is not necessary to be governed by Administrative Order No. 174, they shall so provide in the proposed initial case management order.

Counsel shall e-file the proposed order prior to the initial case management conference.

All counsel appearing at the initial case management conference shall bring with them their calendars and be cognizant of the calendars of any attorneys not appearing at the initial case management conference whose schedules are relevant to the scheduling in this case.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer