Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHANDLER v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, 3-10-1219. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20140402d02 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief and to Transfer Certain Claims to the Tennessee Civil Service Commission (Docket No. 144). Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief is GRANTED, in light of the jury's verdict entered herein. Docket No. 136. As Defendants acknowledge, reinstatement (prospective injunctive relief) is permitted as a remedy in this case. Once she is
More

ORDER

TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief and to Transfer Certain Claims to the Tennessee Civil Service Commission (Docket No. 144). Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief is GRANTED, in light of the jury's verdict entered herein. Docket No. 136. As Defendants acknowledge, reinstatement (prospective injunctive relief) is permitted as a remedy in this case. Once she is reinstated, Plaintiff is entitled to minimum due process in accordance with Tennessee law.

Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Certain Claims to the Tennessee Civil Service Commission is DENIED. Once the Defendants have provided minimum due process to the Plaintiff, Plaintiff may appeal any decision and assert her claims in accordance with Tennessee law.

Also pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Unseal the Trial Court Record (Docket No. 146) and Plaintiff's Motion to Seal and/or Prevent Distribution of Trial Transcripts and Discovery Documents to Any Person Involved in Minimum Due Process Procedures (Docket No. 156).

Defendants' Motion to Unseal the Trial Court Record (Docket No. 146) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Seal and/or Prevent Distribution (Docket No. 156) is DENIED. The trial of this action was open to the public and the docket of the Court is, with limited exceptions, public.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer