Filed: May 05, 2014
Latest Update: May 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the parties shall convene a telephone conference call with the Court on Thursday, May 8, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to address the parties' joint motion for extension of deadlines (Docket Entry No. 47). The Court is not able to grant the parties' motion with all of the proposed deadlines. Specifically, extending the deadline for filing any dispositive motion to October 15, 2014, and maintaining the 21 day t
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the parties shall convene a telephone conference call with the Court on Thursday, May 8, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to address the parties' joint motion for extension of deadlines (Docket Entry No. 47). The Court is not able to grant the parties' motion with all of the proposed deadlines. Specifically, extending the deadline for filing any dispositive motion to October 15, 2014, and maintaining the 21 day ti..
More
ORDER
JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge.
Counsel for the parties shall convene a telephone conference call with the Court on Thursday, May 8, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendants' counsel, to address the parties' joint motion for extension of deadlines (Docket Entry No. 47).
The Court is not able to grant the parties' motion with all of the proposed deadlines. Specifically, extending the deadline for filing any dispositive motion to October 15, 2014, and maintaining the 21 day time period to file a response and the 14 day time period to file a reply, would mean that briefing on a dispositive motion might not be completed until November 19, 2014, leaving fewer than 90 days until the February 10, 2015, trial date, in violation of Local Rule 16.01(d)(2)(f).
If the date and time for the conference call present scheduling conflicts for counsel, they shall confer and call Ms. Jeanne Cox, Courtroom Deputy, at 736-5164, to reschedule.
It is so ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. By order entered August 19, 2013 (Docket Entry No. 21), the plaintiff's claims against defendant Davidson County Sheriff's Office were dismissed, and by order entered September 3, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 37), the plaintiff's claims against defendant Davidson County Sheriff Daron Hall were dismissed.
